First of all...FOX IS NOT NEWS!!! Now Fox waters everything down and the Wall Street Journal is about the facts. If it is not promoting Republicans FOX will LIE its a** off...this literally my first time reading the WSJ and I must say they take a modest and unbiased side.
1. How does the defendant say the 10th Amendment applies to her case?
- she thinks that the federal government is trying to charge her, when the state government should be charging
2.How do groups like the Tea Party use the Tenth Amendment to try to change the scope of government?
2.How do groups like the Tea Party use the Tenth Amendment to try to change the scope of government?
- Federal deals with Federal and States deal with States
3. What does Justice Kennedy say is the point of separation of powers and federalism (in WSJ)?
- "it inheres to the individual and his or her right to liberty"
4. Why did the court have to appoint someone to represent the Third Circuit Court?
4. Why did the court have to appoint someone to represent the Third Circuit Court?
- because Bond and the justice department do not support the opinion of the third circuit court.
5. What differences in coverage did you notice between the two articles?
5. What differences in coverage did you notice between the two articles?
- Fox looks on the bad and WSJ wanted some facts